ELYSIUM and my jaded soul

This post originally appeared August 11, 2013, on the Contact – Infinite Futures SF blog.

I just saw Elysium, the new movie by Neill Blomkamp (District 9), and I loved it. From the first scene, it grabbed me and didn’t let go. I kept thinking, I hope this movie doesn’t disappoint me. Please, please don’t let it turn stupid and disappoint me.

It didn’t.

In a weird way that I can’t really analyze at the moment because it’s after 2am, this movie made me feel the way I feel about Blade Runner. Probably because even though it’s billed as a science fiction action film, Elysium is as cyberpunk as anything, with a gritty near-future dystopian sad-sack world, cybernetic augmentation of the human body, the ability to link the brain to a computer and download information, and hackers rebelling against an oppressive regime.

There were a few moments that almost ruined my immersion, a few little plot points that didn’t quite add up, and I can eagerly criticize the evil-for-evil’s-sake thug Kruger who plays the hands-on baddy, complete with extraneous katana a la Serenity‘s Operative, and an “I Will Sexually and Physically Threaten Women To Motivate the Hero” trope. Getting tired of that one. Blomkamp could have toned him down a bit… ok, a LOT… and Elysium would approach perfection, for me.

But I still loved this movie in spite of its flaws. Because aside from Matt Damon – whose presence in any movie adds a bonus star to its rating far as I’m concerned – what I enjoyed… no, more than enjoyed… what reached deep inside of me and wrung tears from my jaded soul, is that Elysium is real science effing fiction. The kind that actually includes science, technology, humanity and social commentary. The kind that gives you something real to think about.

This movie takes itself seriously. Other than the over-the-top Kruger, who honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if he was only added after feedback from American test audiences or on the insistence of some studio exec… Or, wait… maybe that’s the whole point of his cliché character, to represent the psychotic obsession with sexism and violence we seem to have in the U.S.? Wow.

There are no aliens. The year is 2154, but the technology is not so far removed from reality that it appears magical or far-fetched. No one “realigns” any “deflector arrays.” A robotic police force, powered exoskeletons, storage of data in living cells, and a large space station could be possible within the next four years, if we really tried, not the next one-hundred and forty years. And we don’t have to wait a century to see a world where people living in slums are willing to risk their lives and break the law in order to give their children medical treatment and a better life. One billion people worldwide live in slums right now and that population is projected to grow to 2 billion by 2030.

Yes, there’s a message in this film, and that seems to bother some people. But weren’t there messages in Star Trek? A Clockwork Orange? H.G. Wells’ Time Machine? Logan’s Run? V for Vendetta? Stepford Wives? The message at the core of Elysium is that human suffering should be mitigated by those with the power to do so. Some people have called the movie socialist, but it’s a theme that predates the political term by hundreds of years. Max becomes a savior hero in the vein of Prometheus, Jesus or Robin Hood.

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here

Posted in Movies, Science Fiction, Technology | Tagged , | Comments Off on ELYSIUM and my jaded soul

Where art meets science: Steampunk dinosaurs?

The life-sized skeleton sculptures of Dinosaurs in Motion weren’t steam-powered. Some moved when touched, their heavy heads bobbing on spring-loaded necks. Others operated like giant marionettes, hanging on a system of cables and pulleys, moved by cranks. Electric motors powered others, connected to video game controllers.

All were inspired by actual fossils but made of metal, bolts, springs, gears and the occasional bit of mesh from repurposed screen doors. Quite an experience, walking through this metal menagerie made by John Payne, who merged mechanical science and artistic craftsmanship to create something that would not be out of place in a steampunk novel.

Speaking of steampunk dinosaurs, check out my friend Robert Appleton’s book Prehistoric Clock. It has real dinosaurs, not metal or robotic, because it’s a time travel tale. But maybe these pictures will inspire his next story…

Kinetic sculpture by John Payne, photo by Karen Swain, NCMNS

Kinetic sculpture by John Payne, photo by Karen Swain, NCMNS

Kinetic sculpture by John Payne, photo by Karen Swain, NCMNS

Kinetic sculpture by John Payne, photo by Karen Swain, NCMNS

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here

Posted in News & misc, Steampunk | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Why would aliens menace Earth?

This post originally appeared July 14, 2013, on the Contact – Infinite Futures SF blog.

War of the Worlds paper cutting from the Freakshow Blog

If habitable planets and resources are abundant in the Milky Way, then why would aliens attack us?

To serve man. Resistance is futile. Mars needs women.

SETI Institute senior astronomer Seth Shostak recently told NBC News Science Editor Alan Boyle that any aliens who could make it to Earth would be waaaaay ahead of us technologically. And if they’d solved all of the problems of space travel, they’d be able to solve their own food shortages or environmental issues without needing to eat us. They would be able to fix their own reproductive issues without kidnapping human females. They could build their own servants without needing to enslave us. Natural resources such as water (ice), minerals and gases are abundant on asteroids, moons and uninhabited planets. No need to steal them from our world.

So what plausible motivation remains? Evil for evil’s sake?

Shostak served as one of the consultants for last year’s big alien-attack movie, “Battleship,” and although he made several suggestions for the villainous aliens’ motivation, the filmmakers didn’t pick up on any of them. Instead, the motivation was left unsaid — which is kind of a Shakespearean thing to do. “These guys are just like the bad kids down a dark alley. They’re just malevolent,” Shostak said. “They’re baaad.”

It bears remembering that science fiction isn’t just about science. Authors and filmmakers often function as psychologists or historians as much as (or more than) they are scientists. Alien invasions stories are dramas based on our own trespasses and our worst fears.

War of the Worlds can be interpreted as a commentary on evolutionary theory, British Imperialism and Victorian superstitions, fears and prejudices. The film They Live satirizes the 1980s as a period of conspicuous consumption in which the (hidden alien) elite oppress poverty-stricken humans and a shrinking middle class. Falling Skies depicts the survivors of an alien invasion that destroys 90% of the population — reminiscent of the estimated percentage of indigenous Americans killed by plague after Europeans arrived.

In my Stellarnet Series, it’s not Earth but an alien world that’s invaded by other aliens. And while, at first, the invasion seems based on sheer malevolence, the real reasons come to light as the plot unfolds through books one and two. It’s no coincidence that I wrote book one while we were still embroiled in an Iraq War fueled by false pretenses. Or that Tikati accusations against the “lazy, untrustworthy” Glin are paraphrased quotes made by Anglo-Saxons about the Irish, over a century ago.

What are some of your favorite alien invasion stories? What were the reasons behind the fictional invasion? Is it necessary for an alien invasion to be scientifically — or historically — sound, or does eeeevil suffice as a motivation?

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here

Posted in Movies, On writing..., Science Fiction, Stellarnet Prince, Stellarnet Rebel, Stellarnet Series | Comments Off on Why would aliens menace Earth?

Cogs and Captains at Contemporal 2013

Not Voltaire, just a Scottish guy with a kickass costume

I had a great time this weekend at ConTemporal, the 2nd annual steampunk convention in North Carolina.

SO. MANY. COSTUMES.

And I love costumes, but the highlight for me was meeting musician, artist, author, Dr. Strange impersonator, and award-winning stop-action animator Aurelio Voltaire. I had the opportunity to chat with him a few times, attend his musical performance and see his stop-action animation presentation. Here are a few of his songs I heard Friday night:

Captains All
The Mechanical Girl
Death Death Devil Evil Song
When You’re Evil
Raised By Bats

As a panelist at the convention, I discussed the active NC SF/F community with fellow authors James Maxey, Tonia Brown Jeremy Whitley and Allen Wold. Then Mr. Maxey and I joined Steven S. Long, RPG author with Hero Games, to discuss nostalgia, futurists, visionaries, science, space opera, cyberpunk, steampunk and SF. Possibly one of the best panels I’ve ever been on, unfortunately we only had four audience members to witness the awesomeness.

As a moderator, I led a discussion about podcasting with Tee Morris, co-author of Podcasting for Dummies, and Philippa Ballantine — they are the married duo behind the Ministry of Peculiar Occurances — along with Dave Foland of the Nympho Bikini Cruise podcast and Pizzula comic book.

Then I joined Matthew Penick of Ribbons and Rivets (who made me a replica of the Skyrim apothecary satchel earlier this year) and Kirsten Vaughan to talk about costuming on a budget and tips for steampunk costuming. The room filled for this one, possibly the largest audience I’ve had for any convention panel in which I’ve participated.

ConTemporal featured a Mad Hatter tea room, Makers Expo hall of contraptions, and a Bizarre Bazaar. I spent some time with my friends in the Charlotte Geeks, who were there to promote their Geek Gala coming up in October, and my daughter got to do a Teen Writers Workshop with YA steampunk author Jean Claude Bemis.

Here are a few tintypes from the event…

Looking forward to next year!

– J.L. Hilton

SPECIAL BONUS UPDATED JULY 3, 2013: YOUTUBE VIDEO BY BEATDOWNBOOGIE!

Posted in Conventions & events, News & misc, On writing..., Science Fiction, Steampunk | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Cogs and Captains at Contemporal 2013

My schedule for ConTemporal

Fri 5 pm – Is There Something in the Water? (panelist) North Carolina, and especially the Triangle, seems to produce a high number of science fiction and fantasy writers. What ‘s special about this area that allows this speculative fiction community to thrive?

Fri 6pm – Nostalgia for the Future (panelist) – Why do the SF visions from past eras continue to hold such power on our imagination?

Sat 11 am – Podcasting Workshop (moderator) – Producing a podcast might be simple, but learning the tips and tricks of creating one that people will actually enjoy listening to might be more difficult. We’ll consider questions such as: What makes a good podcast? What’s the best format for your show? What equipment do you need? What are the practicalities of producing your show?

Sat 3 pm – Costuming on a Budget (moderator) – Cost is the most common obstacle for aspiring steampunks and cosplayers of all types. But you don’t have to break the bank to have a great costume – sometimes all it takes is some creativity. I’ve heard that this will include costuming artists from Ribbons and Rivets but I’m not sure who else.

Hope to see you there!

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here 

Posted in Conventions & events, Science Fiction, Steampunk | Comments Off on My schedule for ConTemporal

We live in the world we imagined

This post originally appeared June 16, 2013, on the Contact – Infinite Futures SF blog.

Actual picture of a REAL freaking space station with REAL human beings in REAL space suits, above the actual freaking Earth. How much would this blow Johannes Kepler’s mind? Photo courtesy of NASA.

The Buzzfeed article “27 Science Fictions That Became Science Facts In 2012” illustrates a topic I’ve written about before: The future is now.

When German mathematician and astronomer Johannes Kepler wrote Somnium in the 1600s, he offered a detailed description of how the earth might look to a person on the moon. And now, we know.

Jonathan Swift made reference to the moons of Mars, detailing fairly accurate descriptions of their orbits in his book Gulliver’s Travels, published in 1726. That was about 150 years before their discovery by Asaph Hall in 1877. Now, at this very moment, we have an honest-to-goodness wired and wheeled robot exploring the actual surface of Mars.

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, published in 1818, gave us the archetypal mad scientist experimenting with advanced technology. As the Buzzfeed article notes, we have “mad” scientists creating artificial robotic limbs controlled by the mind, building chimera monkeys from multiple embryos, and implanting light-sensitive microchips in humans to give them sight.

In 1869, Edward Everett Hale published the first installment of “The Brick Moon,” a short story serial in The Atlantic Monthly. It contained the first known fictional depiction of an artificial satellite. Now, Earth has a real, functioning International Space Station.

Martians used a “heat-ray” in H.G. Wells’ 1898 War of the Worlds. Arthur C. Clarke wrote about particle beam weapons in his 1955 novel Earthlight. Lasers became a reality in the 1960s and in April of this year, the U.S. Navy successfully demonstrated its new Laser Weapon System (LAWS).

How about 1984? Amazon sales of Orwell’s 1949 dystopian classic have increased 5,771% since news of the National Security Administration (NSA) PRISM program in the United States.

SF authors no longer need invent impossible technologies nor imagine wondrous — or terrible — futures. We’re there. If we can dream it up for our novels, chances are some scientist or politician somewhere is already on it.

There are no fewer than 12 technological advances in that Buzzfeed article that also appear in my Stellarnet Series, which I began writing in 2009. I’ve got Net goggles, flexible electronic devices, super strong and “invisible” fabrics, doubled life expectancy, self-driving vehicles, and holodeck-style immersive gaming. And as for PRISM, a significant plot point in Stellarnet Prince is that the US government monitors every message and movement of my heroes, via the Internet (or Stellarnet, as its called in my version of 2062), and certain messages are intercepted and prevented from reaching them while they’re on Earth.

Our challenge as entertainers and visionaries now lies not as much with inventing technology but with portraying how it might be used for and against us, how it shapes the world we live in, and how it affects our humanity. That task is possibly the most sacred of literary undertakings, because…

The technologies all around us, running all through our bodies in advanced pharmaceuticals, and mediating our ability to communicate in vast webs of electronic abstraction are the proof that science fiction is the Word of the Cosmos, to be adored, studied, and yet unlike other “Words,” challenged and built upon.  Science alone tells us the What but cannot by itself feed the yearning soul to seek new horizons, because its numbers and statistics are hard to translate into the human-level stories that connect with us on our most basic levels.

For that, there must be storytellers to reveal the universe by revealing the people in it traveling Roads Less Taken, living in future worlds where the right or the wrong choices have been made (or somewhere in between).

Scientists and engineers are humanity’s true leaders, not the ciphers in flag lapel pins haunting the halls of government or the monied parasites who own them from their yachts and private islands… science fiction authors are humanity’s true prophets and priests, its conscience in metaphor where it has not yet manifested openly. (Troubadour)

It’s no longer enough to write about lasers and robots. We have them, now. We need science fiction that explores love, war, sex, religion, oppression, friendship, family, racism, loss, environmentalism, power and survival of the human spirit — in a world where everything we ever imagined comes true.

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here 

Posted in News & misc, On writing..., Science Fiction, Stellarnet Prince, Stellarnet Rebel, Stellarnet Series | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on We live in the world we imagined

SF Priestess and Techoprophet

Priestess of the oracle at Delphi, John Collier, 1891

OK, I’m getting kind of freaked out by the almost daily occurrence of “This is like something I wrote about in my books.” Am I an oracle? How many times am I going to read about the latest gadgets, technology, theories or augmented reality games on Buzzfeed, ThinkGeek and The NY Times (1) (2), and be able to find an equivalent idea in my novels? Or hear about some social or political issue in the news, after it’s already affected my characters?

The latest to cross my laptop is “We’ll be uploading our entire MINDS to computers by 2045…

In just over 30 years, humans will be able to upload their entire minds to computers and become digitally immortal – an event called singularity – according to a futurist from Google.

Ray Kurzweil, director of engineering at Google, also claims that the biological parts of our body will be replaced with mechanical parts and this could happen as early as 2100.

I don’t feature body parts replaced by machines but entire people replaced by digital “sims” — 3D holographic projections. In Stellarnet Rebel, there are sim copies of a living person — Hax — and they help him run the Tech Center in Asteria Colony. In Stellarnet Prince, one of the characters is a sim of a deceased person (I won’t say whom, so no spoilers), whose knowledge, memories, personality, voice and physical appearance are programmed into what is essentially a virtual ghost, linked to the Net.

I’m getting all kinds of worked up whenever these parallels occur, not because I think I’m original or special. Heck, no. SF authors have been predicting the future, extrapolating technology and incorporating social issues into their stories for decades. And a lot of these ideas have been around awhile. I got the idea for J’ni’s “bracer” from an article in Omni magazine about wearable computers — back in the 1980s.

Goddamn chick book

What riles me is the general notion that SF books written by female authors are short on science and research. Or that a character-driven story with romantic elements can’t also have a lot of technology and social commentary. Or this chucklehead who thinks that female authors of SFR “don’t get the details right” because they haven’t read Ray Bradbury (I have) or Arthur C. Clarke (I have) or Douglas Adams (I’ve not only read him, I met him before he died).

I’m right A LOT. Even with my boobs on.

I’ve been told “I don’t read chick books” by men who see the cover of Stellarnet Prince or find out that my publisher is an imprint of Harlequin.

And yet, during the North Carolina Science Festival’s The Science of Science Fiction in April 2012, I sat on a panel with David Drake and read an excerpt from Stellarnet Prince in which Belloc plays a full-body controlled, immersive video game. Afterward, an audience member approached me and said that the excerpt reminded him of the games he used to play in the Stanford virtual reality lab.

A similar game called Mysteria is featured in the first book in the series — which I began writing in May 2009, the same month that tech sites buzzed with rumors about Microsoft’s motion-controlled gaming technology for Xbox, now known as Kinect.

So, when I see things like the Jim Baen Memorial Writing Contest saying it wants “Moon bases, Mars colonies, orbital habitats, space elevators, asteroid mining, artificial intelligence, nano-technology, realistic spacecraft, heroics, sacrifice, adventure,” and Alex Steffen at Worldchanging and others writing about the failure of futurists and SF authors to imagine a plausible future rather than regurgitating galactic Disneylands or regressing into steampunk and alternate histories, and while SFWA refuses to acknowledge my publisher as a “qualifying market” and finds itself mired in charges of sexism, here’s me. Doing my thing.

When Google builds a space station named Perspective, just remember: I called it.

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here 

Posted in News & misc, Stellarnet Prince, Stellarnet Rebel, Stellarnet Series, Technology | Comments Off on SF Priestess and Techoprophet

SF, SFR, SFWA and SEX

Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA) appears to have some issues of sexism within its ranks. (More links here.) Then Stuart Sharp set off a bit of brouhaha when he disparaged the SFR genre. The blogosphere’s been busy, and the subjects of SFWA, Sharp and sexism have even reached the Huffington Post.

The conversation about women and SFF has been going on for awhile. I blogged about the subject when I published my debut novel Stellarnet Rebel in January 2012. Then I blogged a year later about Illogicon (a smallish SFF con) featuring a lot of discussion about misogyny, racism and homophobia in SFF. The Galaxy Express has been an advocate of SFR and women in SF for years, and Debra Doyle wrote about the Girl Cooties Theory of Genre Literature as applied to SFF, back in 2000.

I had the opportunity to experience a range of reactions to my science fiction novels at the Escapist Expo last year. I met people frustrated with the genre’s general lack of character development and over-reliance on violence and gadgetry. Others described how the term “romance” no longer meant bodice ripping and vapid heroines but was being applied to any novel written by a woman, with a strong female lead, in any genre. And I had a few men who saw the cover of Stellarnet Prince and said, “I don’t read chick books.”

One guy complained, “Why is it every time a woman writes a science fiction novel with a female main character, it has to have romance?” I suggested that it might be the same reason why every man who writes fiction with a male main character, the hero ends up getting laid or rescuing a woman with the explicit or implicit hope of getting laid. Two sides of a coin.

In October, I wrote a guest post for my publisher’s You Tell Us feature, on the topic of women and science fiction.

I’ve met many women who don’t read science fiction. They might enjoy supernatural, fantasy or historical romance. But anything with aliens, robots, space ships or lasers, don’t bother to beam them up, Scotty.

Reasons for their dislike include a lack of characters to whom they relate, pervasive misogyny in the genre, absence of emotional depth or romance, too much violence, and too many boring descriptions of aliens, machines and technology. … (more)

Stellarnet Rebel is repeatedly lauded by readers and reviewers for its world-building. It is not a story about ripped bodices and sweaty pecs. It does have a female protagonist and it does depict intimacy, in various forms and stages, affecting or affected by the events of the plots — no different than Star Trek, Firefly, Babylon 5, Star Wars and lots of other sci-fi going back at least to Forbidden Planet. Which, had it been a novel written from Altaira’s perspective, would have been snubbed as “sci-fi romance” too.

When it comes to SF and SFR, I’ve felt like a bit of an outcast, not really fitting into either category. The Stellarnet books are character driven and full of science, gadgets, action and technology. Some readers call it great SFR and others say its not a romance at all. Stellarnet Rebel was science fiction-y enough to be a finalist in the EPIC Award for Best SF ebook of 2012, and romance-y enough to win a SFR Galaxy Award for Best Non-Traditional Romance.

Prior to 2010, I hadn’t read any SFR novels, but I had read plenty of SF. Stellarnet Rebel was my attempt at writing the kind of science fiction I wanted to read — not just because it included an alien/human romance and a female protagonist, but because it included modern technology and social issues, in a future plausibly extrapolated from current trends (thus my publisher labeled it “cyberpunk,” but I think it’s better described as “post-cyberpunk, with aliens”).

I used to be a dues-paying associate member of SFWA, qualified by a short story published in Dragon magazine. However, because of an official prohibition against Harlequin and its imprints (my publisher Carina Press being one of them), and against the acceptance of books published without a minimum $2000 advance (regardless of royalties, subsequent sales, ratings, reviews or awards), I’ve not qualified for full membership. Based on this and the sexism issues, I declined renewal this month.

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here 

Posted in News & misc, On writing..., Romance, Science Fiction, Stellarnet Series | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Is it science fiction, sci-fi or SF?

I’m a published science fiction author but I still don’t grok the difference between “science fiction,” “sci-fi” and “SF.” As with religion, I’ve been warned to choose the right one or else.

I’ve been told that “science fiction” refers to the real stuff — science-based literature exploring the relationship between technology and humanity — while “sci-fi” refers to B-movies and pulp novel crap with lots of lasers and explosions.

This distinction is supported by Wikipedia:

Forrest J Ackerman used the term sci-fi (analogous to the then-trendy “hi-fi”) at UCLA in 1954. As science fiction entered popular culture, writers and fans active in the field came to associate the term with low-budget, low-tech “B-movies” and with low-quality pulp science fiction. By the 1970s, critics within the field were using sci-fi to distinguish hack-work from serious science fiction. … David Langford’s monthly fanzine Ansible includes a regular section “As Others See Us” which offers numerous examples of “sci-fi” being used in a pejorative sense by people outside the genre.

But according to Dictionary.com or Merriam-Webster, the terms are interchangeable:

Sci-fi
adjective
1. of or pertaining to science fiction
noun
2. science fiction

I poked around the Internet and found several threads, articles and blog posts on the topic. Hugo Award winner John DeNardo of SF Signal seemed to share my belief that “sci-fi” is not a negative term.

In my experience, those who use the term “sci-fi” are not cretins or haters. They use “sci-fi” because abbreviations, acronyms and slang are the norm. But “sci-fi” has baggage. There are those who insist that “science fiction” is about thinking and “sci-fi” is for dimwits and studio executives.

“Science fiction” and “sci-fi” are both used as pejorative terms by those outside the fandom, both are disregarded as not “real” literature in many circles, and both terms are still just as likely to be dismissed as past-times for dorks, geeks, nerds and social misfits. To argue about one word being worse than another is about as pointless, imo, as an argument over the terms “television” and “TV.”

Which brings us to “SF.” A few years ago, while trying to get published, industry professionals informed me that the proper way to say “science fiction” in a query letter is “SF.” I’ve also seen “SFF” or “SF/F” for science fiction and fantasy, or “SFR” for science fiction romance.

But I’ve also been corrected by those who claim that “SF” refers to speculative fiction — though others will insist that’s properly “spec fic” — a broader category that includes science fiction, fantasy and other genres.

I started using “SF” but I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve had to explain that “SF” stands for “science fiction,” even to people who read science fiction. Makes the acronym seem like a secret password, bestowed only to the initiated, to separate the “real” fans from the “fake.”

So, which is it? Science fiction, sci-fi or SF? Does it matter? Did it matter at one time, but times are changing? Should geeks reclaim “sci-fi” or did the Syfy channel condemn that phrase to eternal ignominy?

Should there even be terms that label what’s “real” and what’s “crap” in science fiction, and who gets to decide which is which? Authors? Fans? An elite cadre of self-proclaimed “true” fans? Or the general moviegoers, readers and cosplayers whose money funds movies, books and conventions?

~ J.L. Hilton

Connect, support, comment or contact the author here 

Posted in On writing..., Science Fiction | Comments Off on Is it science fiction, sci-fi or SF?

Guest: B.V. Larson on his self-published success

My cousin Brian is also an author. He’s a self-publishing success story, reaching as many as a thousand downloads a day and over a million copies sold since 2010, which led to contract offers from publishers. His most recent book, The Bone Triangle, book two in the Unspeakable Things series, was published by 47North. Find him at BVLarson.com.

JLH: When did you begin writing and what was your first paid publication?

BVL: I started writing seriously and sending things to publishers when I was about 17. It’s been a long road since then. I had a number of pro short story sales in the 90s, then in 2001, I sold a textbook series to a pro publisher. These were college computer science textbooks. I made serious money with those, doing ten volumes by 2010, when I dropped it because fiction was taking off for me. I self-pubbed for about a year, then started getting contract offers from publishers, which I’ve been signing since 2011.

JLH: When did you enter the world of digital publishing and why?

BVL: I found out about Kindle books in April of 2010. I worked all summer, 12 to 16 hours a day, getting my books up there and getting my first sales. This paid off as the Kindle grew in popularity and my sales grew with it. I originally had over ten novels lying around that had been rejected by all the publishers (I managed to get close several times, had agents and deals, but never got a real contract with a real check for a novel). So I figured I would just put them up and see what happened. It turned out to work for me when the public could decide what they wanted to read, rather than a few NYC editors.

JLH: How in the world did you write so many books?

BVL: I built up years of books before I began putting them online. Still, even counting that head start, I’ve written at least half of my work in the last three years. I’m writing faster now, mostly because it’s easier to do work on something that’s paying!

JLH: What’s the key to your success?

BVL: I consider myself to be an entertainer first and foremost. If I was a comedian, I would go up on stage to make people laugh, not to “express myself” or anything else. With every book I write, I’m thinking about the reader all the time. Is he getting bored? Is this what the reader wants to see happen at this point? Would I be upset if I were the reader and guy X died at the end of this scene? That’s what’s in my head. Also, I move the plot faster than most people, and try to do it in unexpected directions.

I think for a lot of writers, writing is about them, not the reader. They write to tell their story, or to make a point, or to feel better about something in their lives. All that’s fine, but to sell a thousand times more books, you have to adopt a different approach. To be clear, I write because I love writing, not just to make money. But I make sure I write things I would like to read, and which I believe most readers would like to read. When I read a self-indulgent book, I’m annoyed with the writer and stop reading. I don’t write that kind of work. Entertainment is all I’m shooting for, and that’s my key to success.

JLH: Does cover art matter? Who does your covers?

BVL: Cover art matters a lot when attracting readers initially, before you have a fan. I do my own covers for self-pubbed books, (completely pro on all my 47North pro sales), but I’m seeking help now in that area to make my self-pub covers better.

JLH: You write in several genres, including science fiction, epic and urban fantasy, and paranormal romance. Do you think this has helped or hindered your marketability? Or is it a fair price to pay to keep from getting bored (and boring readers)?

BVL: Probably, it made things worse for me, as people give me bad reviews when they buy a new book from me and get a very different experience. Originally, I wrote in many genres trying to break in, and because I get bored easily. Now, I’m trying to get more focused.

JLH: What are some of your influences and inspirations?

BVL: I consume media of all forms, and that has influenced my writing. My books feel different because there are movie/game/internet/current technology influences. I’m not purely literary in my interests and background. This upsets some readers, but most love it.

JLH: Are your books targeted to young adults or mature readers?

BVL: My protagonists vary in age, but are usually 25-35. (In other words, actual young adults, not teens.) About content, I wouldn’t give my books to someone under, say, 14. There are “adult situations” implied. There’s very little profanity, no graphic sex, but lots of terrible things happen to nice people, and there’s usually plenty of violent action. This varies with the genre, of course.

There is this odd concept in publishing that goes like this: “There are “young adult” books, which are really kid books for teens and simple people. Then, there are books for “mature” readers, which means a book that an approximately 40 year old NYC agent/editor finds worthy of reading. Honestly, I think there are more types of humans out there than these two flavors. I target 20 to 35 with my books.

JLH: What are you working on right now?

BVL: I’m currently writing Dream Magic, the seventh and final book of my “Haven” series of epic fantasies. It’s almost finished!

JLH: Any advice for aspiring authors?

BVL: This is a fantastic time for authors. We’re out of prison and running wild in the fields outside. Everyone can now publish and get their books read, but only a few will make it to the top. (Think: Hunger Games). But honestly, don’t expect an easy path. Writing fiction is not easy, it’s like learning to play a violin at a concert-quality level. Very few of us can grab up a violin and make beautiful music our first time out. But with practice and fanatical dedication, everyone now has a shot at it!

Posted in Fantasy, On writing..., Romance, Science Fiction, Visiting authors | Tagged , | 1 Comment